"Stone walls do not a prison make, Nor iron bars a cage; Minds innocent and quiet take That for an hermitage" –Lovelace IT was as it were a wheel
within a wheel, a circle within a circle, a play within a play. The
comedy of our trial was being staged within the world-play, and on the
court-room stage itself we the undertrial prisoners had been doing our little
private drama. The stage was set in the room of the As
the proceedings began in court, we would take our
Page – 365 seats.
But the court proceeded in its own way and we went on in ours. The pleaders and
barristers and witnesses and spectators were all engrossed in the subject
matter of the case. The barristers pleaded, the witnesses gave their depositions,
the court made comments, everything went on as is
usual in a court of law. But we remained perfectly neutral and indifferent as
if it did not concern us at all. Our interests were elsewhere. We had come to
sit together forming separate groups of four or five according to our
respective tastes and temperaments. We could of course move from one group to
another as and when we liked. Our topics of discussion ranged over all manner
of subjects: religion and spirituality, literature and science, our work and
our future, all this came within our purview. Our discussions sometimes grew so
loud and hot that Judge Beachcroft – he had been contemporaneous with Sri
Aurobindo at In
the midst of all this, Sri Aurobindo used to sit apart in his little corner.
But we could approach him if anyone had anything to ask. One day we arranged a
"general meeting", that is, requested him to give us a talk – of
course in the court-room itself and during the proceedings! The court would go
on and we would go on with our "meeting". Sri Aurobindo agreed to
speak and he chose as his subject, "Nationalism and the Three Gunas
(Psychological Types)."
Page – 366 Afterwards, on coming out
of jail, he wrote out the substance of this speech and had it published in one
of his papers. It has since been included in his Bengali work, Dharma O Jatiyata. Sri
Aurobindo had to devote a great deal of his time in jail to his counsel,
Chittaranjan Das, for whatever he had to say had to be given in writing. I
found they kept him supplied with foolscap sheets and a pencil in the court
room itself, and he went on wrting out his statements there. He wrote quite a
few pages every day. In these statements he had to explain in lengthy detail
his ideas and ideals, the aims and policy of the Bandemataram and Yugantar
papers. Chittaranjan included all that in his speeches in court. Could the
original manuscripts be recovered, they would be precious documents today. One
day I mentioned to him that I had not had a chance to read English poetry for a
long time and would like to have some. Could he help me? The very next day, he
wrote out a new poem and handed it to me. As he had no paper to write it on, he
had scribbled out the lines along the margins of an old letter! I was
particularly impressed by the last two lines; of the rest I do not recall
anything now. I need hardly add that the poem is now among the lost treasures. While
on the subject of Sri Aurobindo's writings in jail, I cannot help divulging a
secret, namely, that he had written a whole series of essays on the subject of
the bomb. The terrorists had been subjected to bitter attacks in the press and
they had been falsely accused of all manner of things. It was as if Sri
Aurobindo took up his pen to defend them against these accusations. In this
series of four essays he discussed in detail the cult of the bomb. I can still
recall the titles: (I) The Message of the Bomb, (2) The Morality of the Bomb,
(3) The Psychology-of the Bomb, (4) The Policy of the Bomb. The series was not
completed, but what was written could serve the purpose very well. The writings
had been left in my custody and I passed them out of jail to a
Page – 367 friend
of mine. But in order to save them from the vigilant eyes of the police and
such every-day hazards as a house-search, this friend of mine had them shoved
inside a hollow bamboo stem and buried underground. When he looked for them
again after a little while, he found they had been reduced to a dust heap,
thanks to the white ants' benign touch. Let
me then give out another secret in this connection. Just as Sri Aurobindo had
taken up his pen – or shall we say his pencil? – on
behalf of the bomb, similarly Nivedita at a later date once took up the cause of
Swadeshi dacoits. The ideas and motives of these patriots, what impelled
them to take up this particular line were explained with such fine understanding
and sympathy in Nivedita's writing that it read almost like poetry. Here too
the manuscript had come to my hands and was in my custody. That was about the
time when Sri Aurobindo on coming out of jail had taken up his work again and
started the two weeklies, the English Karmayogin and the Bengali Dharma.
At that time, Nivedita maintained rather close contacts with Sri Aurobindo
and ourselves. She used to write for the Karmayogin,
and when Sri Aurobindo went into retirement, it was she who edited the last
few issues of the paper almost single-handed, with the sole exception of
news-items. She continued all the features which Sri Aurobindo had begun. Thus
she too wrote a few "Conversations" on the lines of Sri Aurobindo's
"Conversations of the Dead". I translated them into Bengali and have
included them in my Mriter Kathopakathan (Conversations of the Dead) in
Bengali. While in jail, we had the good fortune to read some unpublished writings of Sri Aurobindo's. Each of us had been furnished by the authorities with a printed brochure containing a report of the exhibits – that is to say, all the documents: letters, notebooks, etc. – which concerned us in that case. These included portions of an unfinished article from Sri Aurobindo's notebook, entitled, "What is Extremism, Nationalism?"
Page – 368
But there was another
article, one that was ready for the editorial columns of the Bandemataram and
was to be published the next day; but instead of going to the Bandemataram office,
it found its way into the hands of the police as a result of the arrests. This
article was so beautiful and perfect from the point of view of both style and
substance that I read it over and over again and committed it to memory and
would often repeat it aloud when I found myself alone. Hear how it begins,
with what calm and majestic periods! I record them here not from the book but
from memory: "Ages ago there was a priest of Baal who thought himself
commissioned by the god to kill all who did not bow the knee to him... At last,
a deliverer came and slew the priest and the world had rest..." How simple the words,
almost all monosyllabic (except five) – how easy in manner! Absolutely
unadorned and still most effective! The movement is that of an arrow, strong
and firm and straight. There is an epic quality about it, what Matthew Arnold
calls the "grand style simple." This piece fortunately has not been
lost; it has found a place in one of Sri Aurobindo's works, in his The
Doctrine of Passive Resistance, under the heading, "The Morality of
Boycott." You might read it for yourselves. You will be delighted, I can
assure you. Now
I am going to divulge to you yet another secret, perhaps the most important of
all, concerning our life in jail. I have said that I had Sri Aurobindo's essays
on the bomb slipped out of jail by handing them over to a friend. But how was
this done? By what means did we carry on this kind of secret interchange with
the outside world? How we could manage to import pistols into jail remained a
major headache for the police. The police invented so many theories and there
was no end to the conjectures indulged in by the public.
Page – 369 They must have been packed
in biscuit tins, or in the bellies of fish, or in jack-fruit,
and what not. Finally, the Police Chief could contain himself no longer and
decided to ask Kanai. Kanai was already under sentence of death and was biding his
time. "Now that all is over," said the Police Chief "where is
the harm if you confess it? Why not show some courage and tell us where you
found the pistol?" Kanai grew serious and said in measured tones, "It
is the spirit of Khudiram who gave me the revolver." Khudiram had been
hanged for his attempt on the life of Kingsford. Well,
let me now explain how the pistols came. They came precisely the way Sri
Aurobindo's writings went. When the police found that we were not such
ferocious beasts after all, they gave us permission to have a chance sometimes
of meeting our friends and relatives. These meetings took place in a room next
to the entrance through the main gate of the jail. They erected a partition of
iron bars through the middle of the room. On one side of this barrier stood the
visitors and friends and we stood on the other: No doubt there were some
sentries about, but they did not particularly bother to watch, for on the whole
there had grown up an amount of confidence in our good faith. But it wets very
easy to pass on anything across this barrier, for with a shawl or heavy chuddar
on, one could easily touch the person on the other side of the bars – out
of an excess of feeling, one would normally imagine. I remember how my uncle once
burst into tears on meeting me in this manner. Anyhow, the pair of revolvers
used by Kanai and Satyen had changed hands through the bars in this manner. I
referred just now to our good faith. In fact our laughter and fun, our mirth
and play, and our sweet simplicity had astonished them all. We had a Court
Inspector, an elderly Muslim gentleman, who would almost burst into tears as he
looked on us. "How dare you laugh and play?" he used to say, "you have not the least idea of the terror you have to face.
You do not know what kind of life it is in the Andamans.
Page – 370 You are not the only ones
who read the Gita. I too have gone through the book repeatedly and still read
it." For this show of sympathy, the gentleman had to suffer punishment.
His promotion was stopped or perhaps he was dismissed from the service. The man
who was captain of the English guard used to say, "You are strange
specimens. You look so tender and soft, and so simple and sweet in your manner!
How could you ever commit such heinous crimes? I have lived in I
have said we used to keep ourselves fully preoccupied with our own discussions,
as we sat within our cage in the court-room, and never paid much attention to
what was going on outside in court. But if something new or interesting or
sensational cropped up, then of course we would just turn round to see. There
was something sensational that happentd one day; it concerned myself. They produced an important witness against me; it
was the cabin-man at the railway level-crossing near Deoghar, a poor old man.
Were he to identify me as the person who had been passing to and fro near his
cabin – we had several times been to Dighiriya hill across the railway line – that
would prove my complicity in the bomb and get me the Andamans without fail.
But who can die whom the gods protect? Our Sudhir-da – I use the title in an
honorific sense, for I am actually one month his senior – got suddenly an idea
into his head. They
Page – 371 had
made us line up within the cage for an identification parade. The poor old man
was brought in to identify Nolini Gupta. Sudhir-da whispered to me, "You
stand in the front line with a quiet nonchalant air. I shall be just
behind." Sudhir-da stood behind, with his head down and showed by his
fumbling and nervous manner as if he were trying to hide himself. The old man
was in a fix; he got so confused that he finally shouted, "That was the
man over there, I have seen him." This settled the point. The entire
court-room rang with laughter. Norton was flabbergasted, for he had been
conducting the case for the prosecution. He was known as "Madras
Norton": he had earned quite a name as a formidable, almost ferocious
barrister at the High Court in Now
let me conclude this story with a description of the last scene. We had all
just sat down to our usual discussions as on any other day, when all on a
sudden the court-room seemed to grow silent and still. Chittaranjan's voice
rose slowly in a crescendo of measured tones. We all stood up and listened
intently attentive in pin-drop silence as Chittaranjan went on speaking, as if
divinely inspired and like one god-possessed: "He stands not only before the bar in this Court
but stands before the bar of the High Court of History…. Long after this
turmoil, this agitation ceases, long after he is dead and gone, he will be
looked upon as the poet of patriotism, as the prophet of nationalism and the
lover of humanity. Long after he is dead and gone, his words will be echoed and
re-echoed not only in
Page – 372
|