|
Sartrian Freedom
THE poise of the ego, the consciousness of the psycho-vital Purusha as envisaged and experienced by Sartre leads to many other not less catastrophic conclusions. Here is something more on Freedom which seems to be almost the corner-stone of his system: "Freedom is not a being: it is the being of man, that is to say, his not-being". A very cryptic mantra. Let us try to unveil the Shekinah. "Being" means "be-ing" i.e. existing, something persisting, continuing in the same condition, something fixed, a status. Freedom is not a thing of that kind, it is movement: even so, it is not a continuous movement. According to Bergson, the true, the ultimate reality is a continuity of urge (élan vital); according to Sartre, however, in line with the trend of modern scientific knowledge, the reality is an assemblage of discrete units of energy, packets or quanta. So freedom is an urge, a spurt (jaillissement): it acts in a disconnected fashion and it is absolute and unconditional. It is veritably the wind that bloweth where it listeth. It has no purpose, no direction, no relation: for all those attributes or definitions would annul its absoluteness. It does not stop or halt or dwell upon, it bursts forth and passes. It does not exist, that is stay: therefore it is non-being. Man's being then consist of a conglomeration (ensemble) of such freedoms. And that is the whole reality of I
man, his very essence. We have said that a heavy sense of
responsibility hangs upon the .free Purusha: but it appears the
Sartrian Purusha is a divided personality. In spite of the sense of
responsibility (or because of it?) he acts irresponsibly; for, acting
otherwise would not be freedom. So then this essence, the
self-consciousness, self-existence, presence in oneself is not a
status, a fixed standing entity: it is not a point, even if geometrical;
Page - 351 it is, Sartre describes, the jet from one point to another, for, real point there is none: so it is the emptiness behind all concrete realities that is the true reality, asat brahman, śunyam – to Sartre that is freedom, freedom absolute and ultimate. Practically this conception of freedom brings into high relief, makes almost all in all, only one aspect, one character or attribute of freedom: the abolition of all ties and obligations and relations beyond oneself involving a hollow self-sufficiency. Naturally such an outlook requires against it a complementary one, even if it is not to correct and complete, at least to support and implement it. Sartre too cannot ignore the fact that the free being is not an isolated phenomenon in the world; it exists along with and in the company of others of the same nature and quality. Indeed human society is that in essence, an association of freedoms, although these movements of freedom are camouflaged in appearance and are not recognised by the free persons themselves. The interaction between the free persons, the reflection of oneself in others and the mutual dependence of egos is a constant theme in the novels and plays of Sartre.
'Freedom cannot be real freedom unless it is licence :
yet society means a curtailment or inhibition or modification of this
absolute liberty. This, conflict has never been resolved in Sartre
and is fundamental to his ideology, 'the source of his tragic
nihilism. That is because the consciousness here lives horizontally,
level with the normal, what we described as psycho-vital
consciousness. The way out lies in transcendence, in a vertical
uplifting of the consciousness and the being. Page – 352
|
